Hear Ye! Hear Ye!
The Evil Esquire Bar Association is seeking public comment regarding the misadventures of New Jersey attorney Paul L. Abramo, Esquire [#101094], prior to accepting nominations for his induction into the EEBA.
According to New Jersey office of attorney ethics, Paul was admonished on October 20, 2008 for “failing to remove his former partner’s name on letterhead after their association had terminated.”
For a reason that eludes us, apparently this is a serious violation of New Jersey’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Perhaps there is more to this story than the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics has revealed to the public?
* * * * * * ASSIST THE EEBA * * * * * *
If you’ve filed a complaint against an attorney that your state’s bar overseers have “declined” to investigate, forward it along with any exhibits thereto for our consideration for publication.
If you know of a lawyer who’s worthy of induction to the EEBA? Send a brief summary of the lawyer’s qualifications along with his or her full name, state(s) of licensure and other identifying information to victims @ evilesq.com and, depending on their conduct, we’ll add them to our Nominee roles or Watchlist.
This is laughable. Failing to remove a name from letterhead? Perhaps the letterhead was expensive and he intended to use it up before making the change. Perhaps the attorney that left was grasping at straws to settle a grudge. This is silly stuff that takes up bar and court resources.
Sally works in Abramo’s office , nice try sally. Very sad Abramo has to pay someone to try an explain his being admonished by the nj office of attorney ethics, I guess they didn’t think this is “silly stuff “. Disciplinary review board direct quote about Abramo ” You conduct was improper and a VIOLATION OF RPC 7.5c and n.j. advisory committee on professional ethics opinion 215, 94 n.j.l.j. 600 (1971)” Abramo even WAS ORDERED to pay for the cost of the disciplinary action .
How about some more Abramo “silly stuff “
$4500.00 IN fines to Abramo by the superior court judge in the Fager case for improper dealing with judge and opposing counsel
How about some more Abramo “silly stuff “
District xb ethics committee supreme court complaint X-08-002E CHARGING MULTIPLE RULE AND RPC VIOLATIONS
How about some more abramo ” silly stuff “
Maybe sally can explain about the incident in the byram shoprite liquor’s parking lot
Mr. Abramo is alcoholic as anyone who has ever encoutered him knows. the NJ judges that he goes before put up with his nonsense because they don’t care about justice they only want to protect “their own”. This sick man should have been disbarred 25 years ago before he was allowed to ruin people’s lives. His knowledge of the law and his political connections have allowed him to drive drunk for years without recourse. The police arrest him and when he sobers up he calls his friendly munucipal judge or municipal prosecutor and the summons goes away. This is the way NJ works now. The Superior Court Judges are just the same, Any misbehavior or fraud by one of the “protected ones” is over looked and the “unconnected lawyer“‘s or the client suffers the loss. Big Business and Big Politics has captured the the NJ Court system and won’t let it go. Mr. Abramo is just the very small “tip of the iceberg” but a prime example of how the NJ Courts now work for the connected rather than the people they are paid to work for. The Democrats that control NJ have taken a page from the Republican notebook-“Money Talks, Nobody Walks”
Protected? Nonsense. Mr. Abramo is notorious for abusive and disreputable conduct towards the court and adversaries. The Superior Court Clerk’s office will warn unfamiliar attorneys; it’s extraordinary. He receives no courtesies and indeed has been compelled to appear for conferences personally so that his decorum, or lack therof, is noted on the record, while his adversaries appear by phone. He is a disgrace to the bar. But the unfortunate outcome of this behavior is a lack of credibility which does his clients a disservice.
Ordinarily the failure to remove a name from a firm’s letterhead would not come to the attention of the District Ethics Committee. But its continued use does constitute a misrepresentation of the legal status of the defunct firm, thus exposing the former partner to potential liability so the admonishment may serve to protect the other attorney. It seems likely that there is indeed more to this story. One way or another the Ethics Committee clearly didn’t buy the “using up the letterhead” argument.
Mr. Abramo fraudulently continued to use Mr. Williams name on his letter for advertisement purposes hoping the potential client’s seeing his yellow page advertisement would believew that Mr. William was still in partnership at that office. Mr. William had made a critical mistake when he undertook partnership with Mr. Abramo. Mr. Abramo is a reckless person probably sprured on by his intense need for alcohol. After Mr. William’s withdrawal Mr. Abramo continued his drinking habits and his behaviour became even more reckless. He was arrested for DUI on at least one occassion and there is no indication this very physically and mentally sick attorney has decided to seek the help he desparately needs.
BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE! ABRAMO is a outright CLOWN, not to be trusted with even the simplest case. Abramo was disposed of from Dolans firm , Abramo was disposed of from Hollanders firm, even Williams Abramo’s most recent law partner had to file complaints with the DRB because of ABRAMO’S HABITUAL UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR .
ABRAMO IS OF DUBIOUS CHARACTER AND LINEAGE!
Sally has not worked for Abramo for more than 3 years.
Abramo are you ghost writing letters again ???
nobody special has the correct insight on Abramo
nobody special shares the opinion of many former Abramo partners and clients
BEWARE OF ABRAMO BEWARE OF ABRAMO BEWARE OF ABRAMO