Articles in this series

17 responses to “Cameron Edwards, Xsquire | ADDED TO EEBA WATCH LIST

  1. tmec

    When I lost my job, we hired Alliance Law Cen­ter hop­ing to help us to save our house to make afford­able by doing load mod­i­fi­ca­tion. We had a hard time talk­ing to any­body from this com­pany. When we received a sale date on our house I’ve called and email Cameron Edwards (attor­ney) numer­ous time to see where we at and request to push the sale date out. Cameron just ignored us untill we couldn’t reach him any­more. 3 days prior to the sale date, Cameron emailed with doc­u­ment attach­ment stated that Alliance Law Cen­ter is in insol­vency. Now we are in jeop­ardy. How can this peo­ple live like this. My friend hired Cameron Edwards and lost her home because he just ran with her money. I found out from this sitehttp://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/malpractise-c214334.html" rel="nofollow"> http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/malpractise-c214334.html that Cameron Edwards is a scam.

  2. Ashley

    My boyfriend and I hired Cameron when he worked for Lib­erty Lawyers as a defense attor­ney. I don’t know any­thing about him scam­ming any­one, because he was a WONDERFUL defense attor­ney. He always was there for phone calls, even in emer­gen­cies, Cameron was there. He was a great attor­ney then, and gave great results, as a defense attor­ney. Like i said, he was our defense attor­ney, maybe he just wasn’t cut out to do Loan Mod’s or bankruptcies!?

  3. tmec

    Check these sites and see how many peo­ple Cameron Edward’s vic­tim­ized, includ­ing myself. My friend lost her home because of his mal­prac­ticed. These peo­ple have the same expe­ri­enced. Once Cameron Edwards got the money, he’s nowhere to find. He never returned calls and email.
    http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/loan-mod-fraud-c256174.html
    http://www.ripoffreport.com/Real-Estate-Services/Alliance-Law-Center/alliance-law-center-san-diego-398be.htm

    Just google his and you find find peo­ple com­plained about his scam/fraud.

    Bet­ter yet check the State Bar Of Cal­i­for­nia, he resigned with charges.
    http://members.calbar.ca.gov/search/member_detail.aspx?x=222549

  4. XEmployee

    Cameron, Is and Always will be a Won­der­ful Attor­ney. It’s peo­ple who use peo­ple to scam other’s that took advan­tage of this WONDERFUL HUMAN.
    I wish him all the best for him and his fam­ily. And if he would ever need any­one to tes­tify as to who the real owner’s where. I’d be more than happy.

  5. tmec

    Again, check the posted sites and you will find out that we have all the same expe­ri­enced. HE NEVER RETURNED CALLS and emails. I don’t think it’s the other peo­ple that told him to ignore his clients.

  6. former employee

    Cameron is a good attor­ney. So were the other that were there on staff. Yes some of them were just sworn in but the fail­ure of the busi­ness was not their doing. If Cameron is guilty of any­thing, its that he lis­tened to Zach Tay­lor and James Nave. Those were the guys run­ning every­thing. They were the ones order­ing the attor­neys around and they were the ones fir­ing the attor­neys so that is why peo­ple never got calls back. Zach con­tstantly changed things that all the peo­ple that were sup­pose to be pro­cess­ing and nego­ti­at­ing were never sure what the pro­to­col was. Zach and James made it a mess by fir­ing their staff and Cameron was unable to stop them because they con­trolled the finances. It pisses me off to see Cameron take the hit for some­thing that Tay­lor and Nave cre­ated and walked away from. They are the rea­son peo­ple lost their homes and or money. The truth will even­tu­ally surface.

  7. former employee

    check out the news clip and read the article.….The media even has dug up enough dirt on who is really respon­si­ble. Like I said, Cameron is guilty of believ­ing all the lies from Tay­lor and Nave.…those guys are out there still run­ning other lit­tle shady busi­ness and have conned oth­ers into believ­ing them. Zach was auda­cious enough to open up another com­pany using James Impe­ri­ale as his head attor­ney, who Impe­ri­ale did turn his back on Edwards and for greedy rea­sons tried to act as if the ALC fail­ure was Edwards fault. As far as Im con­cerned, James Impe­ri­ale is no bet­ter than Zach…Imperiale knew what had gone on, but Zach treated Impe­ri­ale like he cared and Impe­ri­ale bought it. Accord­ing to this news clip though, some­thing hap­pened their which was not a supprise.

    http://www.10news.com/investigations/21184109/detail.html

  8. onemoreex

    Cameron Edwards knew very well that he was sell­ing his bar card work­ing for apollo, I mean alliance, I’m sorry key­point, wait what is it now? Those very words were spo­ken from his mouth to my ears. I think every­one wanted to make money and they were too young and inex­pe­ri­enced to do busi­ness the right way. Cameron always worked hard, strove for and achieved mod­i­fi­ca­tions in con­junc­tion with his staff. He was, in all ways, a very nice and car­ing man. How­ever, Cameron always knew, or by the rea­son­able man test, should have known, that short­cuts were being taken that under­cut the firm finan­cially, inte­grally and even legally. Back-room deals and straight embez­zle­ment, left Cameron with noth­ing to con­tinue work­ing on the cases with. And I assure you, the cases were worked prior to that point. The banks stonewall loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion com­pa­nies and law firms, “los­ing” com­mu­ni­ca­tion records and faxes on a con­stant basis. They are lying cheat­ing scum­bags, but that’s for another forum.
    So, he knew his part­ners were crooks to some extent, but still trusted that he was capa­ble of achiev­ing the mod­i­fi­ca­tions in his charge. That is until every­one ditched him to work on new busi­nesses. By “ditched”, you should read, took all of the tal­ented employ­ees from every depart­ment while raid­ing any money and equip­ment to start a new law firm with Cameron’s old under­ling. Does that make him Satan? No, not really. It makes him not deserv­ing to be a lawyer, if he can’t fig­ure out not to do busi­ness with the afore-mentioned.

  9. Spooky

    Good attor­ney? This clown took $2800 of my girl­friends money. Now her house is in a short sale. For months she was led to believe they were work­ing on her file. A “foren­sic analy­sis” and “nego­ti­a­tions” with the lender. When Alliance law cen­ter closed their doors, we con­tacted (or attempted to con­tact them) in order to pick up her file. When we did pick it up there was no work prod­uct in it and finan­cial infor­ma­tion from other clients. I asked him why the money wasn’t put into a client trust account. He stood there and looked at me with a stupid-I-don’t-know-why-sorry-we-can’t-help-you-look. This guy should be in prison. F**king crook.

    Sorry…I don’t buy the “we were stonewalled” BS…you’re an attorney..do what attorney’s do. File a suit once in a while. A**hole.

  10. onemoreex

    I under­stand everyone’s anger about the sit­u­a­tion. I thought that my response was fair in it’s esti­ma­tion of the lia­bil­ity of Cameron Edwards. He should have known bet­ter than to do busi­ness with namely Zach Tay­lor, James Nave, Justin Sam­pas and Jason Bern­abei. He shouldn’t be a lawyer con­sid­er­ing he couldn’t fig­ure out that he was being bam­boo­zled.
    I don’t think “Spooky” under­stands the loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion busi­ness. You can’t just file suit against lenders willy nilly for every client you have. IF you can prove fraud, you may be able to file suit, but that is extremely hard to prove. You must remem­ber that dur­ing my entire time nego­ti­at­ing loan mod­i­fi­ca­tions, there was no legal guide­lines or com­pul­sion for a lender to mod­ify a loan (in absence of fraud). In fact, even now, most lenders in most instances are not legally required to mod­ify any loans. So the true nature of the busi­ness is to call, hound and threaten the banks until they give. As for you not believ­ing my stonewalling argu­ment, go ahead and try to get a mod­i­fi­ca­tion on your own. In nearly every instance you will be for­warded to a mil­lion dif­fer­ent peo­ple across the coun­try. You will be lucky to find one per­son who will help you. When you do find that per­son, be sure to get their name. In many instances you will never get that same indi­vid­ual on the line again. They will ask for paper­work from you, tell you they need 48 hours to even tell you if they received the fax. 48 hours later, “no, we didn’t get it”. Send it again, and 48 hours later they may have it. At this point, you will be told to wait 4–12 weeks to speak to a nego­tia­tor about the file. Our records indi­cated that 90% of our files that were “hold­ing” for a nego­tia­tor on the lender’s end, were “lost” by the bank by the time we were sup­posed to speak to a nego­tia­tor and we were told to start again from the begin­ning. If that isn’t stonewalling, I don’t know what is. If you think we could just sue the lender, I ask for what? Once again, these lenders aren’t legally required to do any­thing. I under­stand every­one here being upset with Cameron and loan mod­i­fi­ca­tion com­pa­nies. I would like for every­one to ALSO get more upset about the laws that allow lenders to screw every­one, pocket the bailout money and screw you once more while let­ting oth­ers take the blame. GENIUS

  11. onemoreex

    PS Cameron and cohorts screwed all of their clients by pre­tend­ing it would be easy to get you a mod­i­fi­ca­tion. They are very guilty of that. As for not work­ing on files, I worked as a nego­tia­tor 12–14 hours a day 6 days a week for a year. The own­ers may be crooks, but the non-lawyer employ­ees such as myself worked tire­lessly on behalf of our clients.

  12. Spooky

    onemoreex, I don’t think whether or not I under­stand the mort­gage mod­i­fi­ca­tion indus­try is rel­e­vant at all. What is rel­e­vant is that Cameron Edwards, act­ing in his capac­ity as an attor­ney, had para­pro­fes­sion­als such as your­self, do work that they may not be qual­i­fied to do. The nego­ti­a­tions should have been done by an attor­ney, which is what we we’re led to believe was hap­pen­ing. 2. Fees were advanced and used, instead of being put into a trust account. 3. You write that you worked on files, but my girl­friends file has no records other than what she pro­vided. You have a laun­dry list of what the mort­gage com­pany does. You’re right, the mort­gage com­pany doesn’t have an oblig­a­tion to respond. So send a demand let­ter, then file a com­plaint in court. the idea here is to com­pel the other side to act. You say for what? Well, how about all that BS that ALC sold us on like the “we review the file for RESPA vio­la­tions. a foren­sic analy­sis of your loan docs.’ That’s what Cameron Edwards should of done, that’s what he didn’t do. And then there is the mil­lion dol­lar ques­tion. Where is our MONEY?

  13. Anon

    I was very inter­ested to see what you wrote about Cameron, and a lot about this Zack Tay­lor and asso­ciates. I don’t see any recent posts.

    Still if this is being fol­lowed, you may be inter­ested to learn what I paid $680 to an inves­ti­ga­tor to find out.

    Taylor’s full name is Zachary Ellis Tay­lor and he has a two felony record in the State of Cal­i­for­nia. drug pos­s­e­sion and for shoot­ing a restu­rant clerk was what the inves­ti­ga­tor said. All I got was Cal­i­for­nia case num­bers but I have requested more info from the state.

    The oth­ers appear clean at first glance. Maybe our lit­tle lawyer should have done some research before align­ing him­self a felon.

    Either way, I don’t know if any­one is still pay­ing atten­tion to this so I’ll post what I learn if any­one shows interest.

  14. Spooky

    Anon…I am very interested.

  15. sherio

    I am also inter­ested in what you find out. We got taken for $4800 same story as every­one has already stated. Does any­one know if there is going to be action taken against Tay­lor. Sounds like a class action is overdue.

  16. tmec

    Im very interested.

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words, name and web site identification in attribution.