California. Hear Ye! Hear Ye!
On September 7th, 2008 the California Bar “disciplined” Elisa Ann Castro for failing to perform legal services competently, refusing to refund unearned fees, refusing to cooperate with State Bar investigators and failing to take actions necessary to avoid her clients being prejudiced in the course of legal actions.
According to the stipulation order, Castro’s behavior: significantly harmed a client, the public or the administration of justice and that the misconduct evidenced multiple acts of wrong doing. Castro signed this stipulation. All totaled there were 18 counts of misconduct in 12 cases.
The “discipline” imposed?
Castro was suspended for one year. The “Bar” stayed her suspension i.e., she’s not really suspended. In lieu of suspension, the Bar placed her on probation and ordered her to take the multi-state professional responsibility examination (MPRE).
The “Bar” cited “mitigating” circumstances affecting their decision were that Castro had no record of prior discipline and that she participates in the California Bar’s Lawyer Assistance Program– a program to assist lawyers with mental health and substance abuse issues i.e., money that could be spent investigating and prosecuting complaints of attorney misconduct TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC, CLIENTS and THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE is diverted to help NUTS and ADDICTS continue to practice law.
Castro also stipulated to provide restitution. The amounts she agreed to repay are PALTRY and bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum which of course doesn’t reflect the opportunity cost her clients incurred by not having the use of those funds.
Considering the amount damage Ms. Castro inflicted on her clients, it doesn’t appear from our reading of the documents that the restitution she agreed to includes amounts to compensate them for the consequences of her behavior– i.e., consequential damages.


