Nathaniel Davis, Xsquire | REPRIMANDED

New Jersey.  Hear Ye! Hear Ye!

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey rep­ri­manded lawyer Nathaniel M. Davis as a result of his sus­pen­sion for one year and one day in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

That sus­pen­sion was based upon mon­sieur Davis’ improper prac­tice in that state for a period of three years while on inac­tive sta­tus. In addi­tion, Mr. Davis engaged in mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tions to the court, oppos­ing coun­sel and the con­tin­u­ing legal edu­ca­tion board.

Come on Pennsylvania! Was Davis under oath when he made mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tions to the court, oppos­ing coun­sel and the con­tin­u­ing legal edu­ca­tion board? Obviously not or he’d have been charged with per­jury, dis­barred and run­ning for president.

Obviously New Jersey didn’t want to see Mr. Davis lose his abil­ity to earn a liv­ing mak­ing “mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tions” so they did the sport­ing thing and “rep­ri­manded” him instead of sus­pend­ing him while he was on sus­pen­sion in Pennsyltucky. Boo-Ya Jersey!

Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Discipline Review Board for the Office of Attorney Ethics. Robyn M. Hill appeared for Respondent.

Have any of Mr. Davis’s clients, oppos­ing par­ties or the pub­lic been injured as a con­se­quence of his actions?  If so, are those who were injured sat­is­fied with the dis­ci­pline imposed in this case?  Has resti­tu­tion been made?

Have there been any other instances of mis­con­duct by Mr. Davis that haven’t been addressed by the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics or the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board?