17 responses to “Sandeep Baweja, Esquire | [________]”

  1. anon

    Interesting blog. Keep pro­mot­ing it.

  2. thePenguine

    Interesting! Franceschim is obvi­ously try­ing to spin this to escape lia­bil­ity. The CalBar doesn’t under­stand breach of fidu­ciary duty. It’s too neb­u­lous a con­cept for them so I doubt they’ll pro­ceed against Franceschim– at least on that course… if at all.

  3. amom

    Somebody should start a class action law­suit against the California Bar Association. They are corrupt!

  4. moxi

    this ass­hole took a $675k fee too. we’ll never see any of the money from this suit and I agree with #3 the California Bar admin­is­tra­tors are a bunch of cor­rupt fuks. i filed a com­plaint about my ex-wife’s lawyer. she gave false evi­dence to the judge in our case and they didn’t even look into it. for­tu­nately for me the judge didn’t con­sider it but what if he had? i’d be screwed and these ass­holes would do nothing.

  5. Victim

    My hus­band and I were shorted $13000, which were stolen by Sandeep. I made sev­eral calls imme­di­ately after the judge­ment and he told me funds were held in sav­ings wait­ing to final­ize the num­ber of plain­tiffs and get approval to take the “unclaimed funds” and dis­burse to the clients, result­ing in MORE money for us. He lied to me, mul­ti­ple times over sev­eral months. That $13000 would have allowed us to become debt free and put a chunk into sav­ings for our chil­dren. He con­tin­ues to prac­tice a lucra­tive law career and we still strug­gle. That’s justice.

  6. Topper

    Do you really believe he lost the money? I am a vic­tim of this creep and I want jus­tice. I don’t hold out much hope of ever recov­er­ing any­thing. I have never been able to get an exact fig­ure out of any­one over at Garden City Group or from Baweja after numer­ous calls and emails start­ing back in March 2008. The orig­i­nal let­ter stated that Zip Realty owed me $3,500.00 but no one would ever con­firm any­thing after that first let­ter. I received his smarmy let­ter of apol­ogy this past week­end, the 24th of January. It was dated 20 January 2009. I started look­ing into this and I found this blog on an Indian web­site: http://sandeepbaweja.blogspot.com/ Someone named Sandeep Baweja was look­ing to invest 2 Million over there on the 28th of December 2008, 4 days after he sup­pos­edly came clean to the judge. Has any­one looked into those alle­ga­tions that he has ties to Hamas and other rad­i­cal Islam groups? Just curi­ous if the FBI or DHS might be inter­ested.
    If they haven’t seized his pass­port yet, they better.

  7. J.

    I was one of the lucky few that did receive my funds. They were one third of what I was orig­i­nally told I would receive. I only got the money after months of com­mu­ni­cat­ing with him and his office and finally threat­en­ing to con­tact the State Bar of California and the Attorney Generals Office. I had my money two days later by wire trans­fer. In my heart I had a feel­ing some­thing was fishy. But had no idea the mag­ni­tude of his fraud­u­lent actions. My heart goes out to those who have got­ten noth­ing. Although, how can I be sure the amount I received was the cor­rect amount as I never received any com­mis­sion state­ments? Also, should we as a class have the right to recover our 25% in attor­neys fees we paid to the peo­ple who were sup­posed to be there to pro­tect us?

  8. ss

    Just found out from a friend, 2 cases are filed against him
    Case Number: 2:2009cv00292
    Filed: February 12, 2009
    Court: Nevada District Court

    Case Number: 2:2009cv01449
    Filed: March 2, 2009
    Court: California Central District Court
    What does this mean???

  9. admin

    Another suit. Well of course that means more lawyers! And more Legal fees! Undoubtedly there are bunches of other oppor­tunis­tic Esqs rumi­nat­ing on how they can get in on the action too. Unless the defendant(s) have insur­ance that will cover Sandeep’s foray into the stock mar­ket, it also means less for Baweja Law “clients.” One not too remote pos­si­bil­ity is that a Federal Judge could con­sol­i­date the suits. We always sug­gest that you con­tact an attor­ney if you are con­cerned about the impact of events on any claims you may have. Any Esquires fol­low­ing this care to com­ment… anonymously?

    Just checked… the California Bar Clowns still list Bawej’s license as active. Wonder what they’re “think­ing”? Perhaps that he can ponzi his way out of this?

    *** IMPORTANT *** When retain­ing California Attorneys— Use Prophylactics

  10. EvilEsq

    Update! Baweja still listed as active on Cal Barffoons website.

  11. John Foley

    I’ve been ripped off by two attor­neys. One time we were able to get the MF dis­barred, as he been pock­et­ing retain­ers and not doing any work. The sec­ond time an attor­ney had pock­eted some stock cer­tifi­cates when he was sup­pos­edly help­ing my mother untan­gle my uncles estate. The attor­ney then claimed he never received the cer­tifi­cates. What I found works with these crooks is heavy doses of inter­net pub­lic­ity. Ripoffreport.com will even­tu­ally con­nect with google to the point when enough com­plaints come on. It gets to the point where you’ll type Sandeep’s name into any search engine and an avalanche of neg­a­tive info comes out to the point he becomes a totally obso­lete as an attor­ney or busi­ness­man and his only choice is to do the right thing.

  12. Brad

    cor­rect name of co coun­sel is ernest frans­eschi. look up his great track record on the internet

  13. oliva

    the State Bar of California has decided to let Sandeep Baweja vol­un­tar­ily stop prac­tic­ing law in California. By tak­ing this action he will NOT be dis­barred. In 5–10 years he can apply to rein­state his license. What does this mean for those of us who were cheated? This means that the California Bar Association has closed the case and will not work on behalf of any clients cheated in this deba­cle. Their expla­na­tion is that they only go after “attor­neys.” Since he relin­quished his license he is no longer an attor­ney and they can’t con­tinue pur­su­ing the case.

  14. File A Complaint

    Has any­body who has been ripped off by this guy actu­ally filed a com­plaint with the State Bar of California, FBI, local police? If not, why not? Don’t expect the other guy to do it? Certainly his theft crimes alone con­sti­tute “crimes of moral turpi­tude” (the type of con­duct that the State Bar con­sid­ers dis­bar­ment.) Without a doubt this guy should never be allowed to prac­tice law again. In addi­tion, the list of state and fed­eral crimes he has com­mit­ted is ridicu­lous, includ­ing wire fraud, grand theft, bank fraud, etc. He should eas­ily do 20 years. If this guy has screwed you, then file your com­plaints. He should not be allowed to get away with this.

  15. Dudley Do Right

    Scam’d-it finally got caught with his hand in the cookie jar, its time to rejoice. Whoa those ponies»>Not that fast folks, come down outta those clouds cause he’s still up to his same old tricks, just not in the same way.
    Here’s the scoop, ready?
    Sources around the water-cooler say he has a new firm, they call them­selves Paragon Business Lawyers. Paragon is really a spin-off of Baweja Law Group, a Scam’d-it brain-child (since he thought it up him­self, ewe), which is covertly oper­at­ing under­neath the name and license of a for­mer Scam’d-it employee named Kamran Malik. Now your prob­a­bly think­ing to your­selves ??? Old Kamran might just shoulda beat some seri­ous feet. Huh, am I right? Yep, I’m right.
    So here’s what we think is going on, and besides us think­ing it, its highly prob­a­ble too. Drum roll please»»
    Mr. Malik may have got­ten some seri­ous cash to stay on and keep the busi­ness going. Look at it this way;
    Kamran’s now big man on the totem pole (just pic­ture a fat man with a huge stick who has an equally fat wal­let too), per­fectly posi­tioned to take all the glory, while Scam’d-it stays behind and out of view. What more could any­one ask?
    Well it goes some­thing like this;
    Scam’d-it is con­tent for now, con­jur­ing up his con­coc­tions of bed­lam and deceit. Full well know­ing he has a few short years until all is for­got­ten and out of the way. Besides, he’s doing what he does best, he’s cre­ated another smoke screen, just like he always does, one way or another. No mat­ter how he has to do it, he will achieve it, tak­ing the blame off him­self and cast­ing it upon oth­ers. Especially those who are unfa­mil­iar of who their really deal­ing with, and that’s just the way he likes it.
    So the moral of the story is here»>
    Lawyers are spin mas­ters. They take their clients words, always opt­ing to refor­mu­late them; we know the truth is never really being told. But hey, after all, thats what its about. So next time, if there is a time and the law rears its ugly head, real­ize who your deal­ing with and know they shouldn’t be entirely trusted.

    This isn’t Baweja’s first rodeo either;
    He’s had dis­putes against him before, a pro­fes­sional neg­li­gence in San Diego, Ca is cur­rently ongo­ing. There’s also the count­less hours he’s known to have spent defend­ing the myr­iad of com­pa­nies his father owns, a licensed CA real estate bro­ker. Between the two of them, its safe to say this won’t be their last rodeo either.

  16. EvilEsq

    UPDATE: BAWEJA agrees to plead guilty to wire fraud and obstruc­tion of jus­tice. See: OC Attorney To Plead Guilty To Losing Clients Funds

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words, name and web site identification in attribution.